Home
Forum
Help
Search
Gallery
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 10, 2010, 10:48:58 PM
CamcorderUser.Net
>
GENERAL TOPICS
>
General Comments and Feedback
>
Question about HD camcorder
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
Go Down
« previous
next »
Send this topic
|
Print
Author
Topic: Question about HD camcorder (Read 2234 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
on:
December 26, 2008, 05:27:25 PM »
I'm looking to buy an HD camcorder, and have a general question.
If I buy a Canon HV30, which uses miniDV tape, what format does the image get recorded in? Will the HD footage be in an AVI format? If I want to convert the footage to SD, do I import/capture the video in an SD/AVI format, or do I have to capture and edit in AVCHD and then render/encode to an SD format (likely mpeg2)?
thanks - dcman
Logged
Adam Gold
Addicted
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 76
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #1 on:
December 27, 2008, 01:59:55 AM »
Neither.
HDV tape is m2t, which is how your NLE will likely capture it. You could downconvert upon capture if you wanted to, but that would be wasting the entire benefit of an HDV cam. If you did that it would be SD avi.
Tape cams do not use AVCHD at all.
You're much better off shooting, editing and mastering in HDV and then only downconverting when you burn to disc, as long as your PC can handle it.
Logged
Adam
Proud owner of 8, no, 7, no, wait, NINE Sony HDV cams. Somebody please help me!
"There are no experimental failures. There's only more data."
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #2 on:
December 27, 2008, 06:01:37 AM »
now things make more sense to me, I knew I wasn't understanding something
thank you for you help, and happy holidays!
Dan
Logged
Guy Bruner
Publisher
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Gender:
location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 722
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #3 on:
December 27, 2008, 07:30:37 AM »
I agree with Adam for simple editing. But, if you are doing green screen, significant color correction, heavy compositing/layering or plan to do multi-generation edits, it would be better to convert to a lossless codec like
MSU
,
Lagarith
,
HUFFYUV
or similar before editing and authoring.
Here
is a comparision report that may help you select the optimum lossless codec for your purposes. The disadvantages are you must do a conversion before editing, you need significantly more HD space to accommodate the larger files, and you change color space so it is imperative you use a monitor that reflects the displays of the intended audience.
Logged
Guy
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #4 on:
December 27, 2008, 11:49:54 AM »
I am likely going to buy a Canon HV30 within the next 30 days or so. Prices on camcorders are seriously low and I'm in the market for something new that will be relatively current for the next few years. But, the rest of my equipment isn't quite up to HD yet. My computer is old, and I don't own a blu-ray DVD player or a blu-ray DVD burner. My plan is to upgrade as I can afford over the next few months. In the interim, I'll still be watching SD video, so I need to understand the workflow of filming in HD and downconverting.
I AM getting into more compositing and green screen kinds of stuff, so knowing how to use HD information is very helpful. Even if I'm not ready right now, I need to plan for the future.
Thank you for the information!
Dan
Logged
Adam Gold
Addicted
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 76
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #5 on:
December 27, 2008, 12:20:56 PM »
Quote from: Guy Bruner;2308
...it would be better to convert to a lossless codec...
Guy's absolutely right; I was going to recommend Prospect HD from Cineform with Premiere but it's pretty expensive and does indeed quadruple the disk space you need... about 60 GB per hour at the best quality (the lower-priced Aspect HD is being discontinued).
But I just wanted to clear up the basics first. I wouldn't even try to edit m2t because of the GOP/re-rendering issues.
Logged
Adam
Proud owner of 8, no, 7, no, wait, NINE Sony HDV cams. Somebody please help me!
"There are no experimental failures. There's only more data."
Guy Bruner
Publisher
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Gender:
location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 722
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #6 on:
December 27, 2008, 12:33:13 PM »
Yeah, I was going to mention Cineform, too, but it is priced out of the reach of most of us. There is a basic Cineform codec included in Vegas for those that have that software.
Dan,
If you buy an HV30, you can still shoot in DV. IMO, there is little advantage to shooting in HDV and downconverting to standard def. You
might
see slightly better picture detail if you are using top notch editing/authoring software and are viewing on an HDTV that upscales. Plus, DV requires less computer horsepower to edit.
HDV (and AVCHD) does look awesome on an HDTV, though. I have found no need to author in BD. I can store the files on a media server and stream it to my TV. That saves the cost of those BD blanks and a burner. It is rather easy if you have a Playstation 3. Alternately, you can author HDV to a standard DVD if you are willing to compromise on the play time. You'll still need a BD player to view the video.
«
Last Edit: December 27, 2008, 12:36:50 PM by Guy Bruner
»
Logged
Guy
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #7 on:
December 27, 2008, 03:36:35 PM »
Hmmm - this very quickly gets more complicated than I wanted.
The reason I went with miniDV in the first place was that the AVI format is easily edited. I really like that.
I really, really, really want to be able to work in high definition. The prices are right, and now that I've seen HD quality, I don't want to go back.
Maybe I could cope without a blu-ray player or burner right now and use one of these with one of my back-up hard drives -
HD Media Player
- Poncho discovered these not too long ago.
Maybe miniDV isn't the way to go with HD.
I realize that if you feed a man a fish, you feed him for a day. You show him the internet, he can figure the rest out himself. But, I'm hoping to speed that process up a bit for myself. For folks using HD and editing in HD, what codec/format (I'll work backwards from here to decide what camcorder) do they find easiest to use when editing HD footage? AVCHD used to be pretty difficult I know, at least in comparison to AVI. I will check out the comparison report kindly linked by Guy, but I also want to know what folks simply prefer, like, and find simplest. Letting me know your personal preference would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
dcman
«
Last Edit: December 27, 2008, 03:49:05 PM by dcman
»
Logged
Guy Bruner
Publisher
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Gender:
location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 722
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #8 on:
December 27, 2008, 04:58:51 PM »
Sorry for the info overload, Dan.
Basic questions: Are you viewing high def video on an HDTV? A computer? What are your future plans for viewing/sharing?
Keep in mind that HD video does not require Blu-ray discs (BD) for viewing. You can view HD video (HDV, AVCHD) on your computer or an HDTV from a flash drive, portable hard drive, a media server, or directly from the camcorder. So, you don't need to purchase a BD burner and media in order to view video you shoot on an HDV or AVCHD camcorder.
For example, I use a Playstation 3 to view Netflix BD movies. But, it will also connect via LAN to my main computer for serving up high def videos directly from its hard drives...either HDV or AVCHD...that I have transferred from my camcorders. The PS3 will also allow me to plug in my SDHC cards that I use to record AVCHD from my Panasonic SD1. I can then play them directly on my HDTV through the PS3. I believe that there are some HDTVs that have flash readers incorporated into their hardware so you don't need a media server like the PS3 to intermediate.
You can also play video directly from the camcorder to an HDTV using HDMI or component video. Most HD camcorders, such as the HV30, offer an HDMI output...as well as component.
The advantage of the HV30 is that you can store HDV video, even edited video, on the miniDV tapes. Tape archival storage is unsurpassed for cost effectiveness and reliability. Your other options are to store on hard disk, SDHC cards, miniBD (DVD) or BD. A low cost option is to shoot HDV, edit it and record it back to tape in HDV for playback and archive. You will lose some quality if you do extensive editing in HDV, but it will probably be unnoticeable to the untrained eye. This way you save a lot of money not buying a BD burner and media, or a media server like the PS3. The disadvantage is that you have to use the camcorder as a recorder, editing and playback device.
Again, I'm sorry if this is info overload. The HV30 is an excellent choice for a first HD camcorder. Prices are extremely low right now and we are unlikely to see this kind of value again.
Logged
Guy
ForFun
Jr. Member
Online
Posts: 98
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #9 on:
December 27, 2008, 05:46:28 PM »
Quote from: Guy Bruner;2313
Sorry for the info overload, Dan.
Hey, don't be sorry about this, Guy. I have been following this thread very closely and learned a lot from it. I like the
Play Station
concept. I just might have to get me one of those.
Logged
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #10 on:
December 27, 2008, 06:17:19 PM »
Personally, I rarely cease to be amazed by how much I don't actually know. I have also learned a lot.
I have an HDTV, with an HDMI input to spare. For viewing, I could buy the HD media player I referenced earlier. Another option is the playstation. I don't have a playstation, but that idea is especially intriguing. I like gadgets I can use for more than one purpose. Games, movie downloads, and home video playback seems like a lot for one package. That might be an especially good value.
An HD camcorder makes sense to me, especially since the cost of the Canon HV30 is about half of what I seem to remember. My research seems to generally indicate that HDV video (which I have learned is m2t) is generally of somewhat higher quality than AVCHD, and that AVCHD is a total pain to edit. That and the Canon HV30 (which records in HDV) is espcially good. I'll do a little more research, but I may go with the hassle of the miniDV tapes to get the format, resolution, and camera. If anyone has had a good experience with a tapeless medium, please let me know.
But, as I said, I'm not fully prepared for HD in terms of hardware. While I can figure out the playback, I'm pretty sure I will need to upgrade some computer components (or even get a new computer) to do the editing I want. I don't have enough processing power for HDV. I like to do more than the general cut-and-paste, and have started to play more with compositing, which is memory intensive in SD (and much more so in HD). I also like to play with render settings to tweak my video and the try to improve it, have done some keyframing, saturation and color adjustments, etc. My computer just couldn't handle any of this in HD, but this appears to be my only real hurdle right now. Since I don't feel like shelling out cash for both a new camera and an upgrade right now, that and my wife would make me sleep in the garage , I may "slum" for a while and use only SD footage until I can get everything else up to speed. This is why I was initially trying to figure out how to get SD footage out of an HD, miniDV camcorder, and couldn't quite figure out how this would happen.
Thank you everyone for your help (especially you Guy).
Dan/dcman
Logged
ForFun
Jr. Member
Online
Posts: 98
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #11 on:
December 27, 2008, 08:24:23 PM »
Quote from: dcman;2315
that and my wife would make me sleep in the garage Dan/dcman
My wife gets on me when I spend on video stuff, so I can relate to that.
Logged
Atwinator
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 323
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #12 on:
December 27, 2008, 08:51:05 PM »
Hey DC, I thought I would just add a few of my observations. I use Prospect HD which works great although it is expensive. The less expensive t without the Aspect is being discontinued within a few days I think but there is a cheaper option still. Neo does the same as Aspect but without the effect plugins and templates for Premiere. I'm not sure which NLE you use but if it's not Premiere then Aspect would have no added benefit for you anyway. But quite honestly you don't need an intermediate to edit and produce video from HDV. I did it often with straight HDV before I had Prospect, even with my older computer. What are your computers specs? A good way to test it would be to download an M2T (HDV) file to your computer and try to edit it. If you can't find one I'll be happy to upload one for you to try it.
Lastly I just want to highly recommend the PS3. It is by far the best blueray player and upscaling DVD player on the market. Everything else it does is just a HUGE bonus! Even SD dvd's played on this thing in upscaling mode look like HD. It also has the highest resolution gameplay available even though they are only 720p at this point. I can only imagine what they will look like when they come out in 1080p. Anyway best of luck and have fun!:)
Logged
Ed
dcman
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 102
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #13 on:
December 27, 2008, 09:06:27 PM »
Ed -
thanks for the observations - very helpful.
I'm using Sony Vegas Movie Studio 6. I'm thinking about upgrading to Vegas 9 (full version - B&H photo sells a CD only but apparently licensed version pretty cheap). Still, the movie studio version, even as old as version 6, is supposed to handle HDV.
My computer itself is a few years old, 300 gb hard drive, 820 Pentium D, 1 GB of RAM. Everything I'm reading says I need 2.6 of Ram at least to manage HDV material, but maybe I'm reading the wrong stuff.
Can you point me toward an m2t file so I can give it a shot? I would find that very helpful.
Thanks - Dan
Logged
Atwinator
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 323
Question about HD camcorder
«
Reply #14 on:
December 27, 2008, 09:11:16 PM »
Oh, one thing I forgot to mention is that HDV's resolution of 1440x1080 is actually the same as 1920 by 1080 except that the pixels have a different PAR (pixel aspect ratio). 1920x1080 is square pixels while 1440x1080 is not. Some software, such as Prospect for example will convert the aspect ratio to 1920, but the result doesn't look any different.
Logged
Ed
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
Go Up
Send this topic
|
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
GENERAL TOPICS
-----------------------------
=> General Comments and Feedback
=> Camcorder Selection Advice
=> How-To's, Hints, Tips and Kinks
=> Where and Where Not to Buy
=> Classified Ads
-----------------------------
Video Showcase
-----------------------------
=> Film Making
=> Documentaries
=> Event Videography
=> Comedy
=> Worship Services Videography
-----------------------------
CAMCORDERS
-----------------------------
=> Canon
=> JVC
=> Panasonic
=> Sony
-----------------------------
AUDIO & SOUND MANAGEMENT
-----------------------------
=> Microphones
=> Preamps & Mixers
-----------------------------
LIGHTING
-----------------------------
=> Scene Lighting
-----------------------------
STABILIZERS
-----------------------------
=> Tri- & Monopods
=> Gravity & Body-Mount Stabilizers
=> Cranes, Booms & Other Stabilizers
-----------------------------
VIDEO EDITING & AUTHORING
-----------------------------
=> Video Editing Software
=> DVD & Blu-ray Authoring
=> Compositing, Titling & Special Effects
=> Voiceover and Soundtracks
=> Video Editing & Authoring Hardware
=> Free Software
-----------------------------
MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT
-----------------------------
=> Depth-of-field Adapters
=> Add-on Lenses
=> Filters
=> Hoods, Matteboxes and Shades
=> Housings, Casings and Bags
=> External Controllers and Devices
=> Portable Monitors
Loading...